fund raising the question of when the bracket that holds it is entertainment rages access. Explain the movies on your argument, not by what transpired. Toy Story 3 can be narrated in many ways, but remains the most accepted one that tells the story of toys that are struggling to survive. This story celebrates the adventure, tension, excitement and melancholy moments. We turn to the issue and the actions that are swinging the frame from one side to another, so that if the toys they feel displaced, even desolate, the argument itself gives us the keys to understanding the reasons: the owner is about to become a university student. From there we can expand on the journey that it will take the toys to occupy their new place in the world (at the end of the film), a garden, another house. That moment, which also describes the child's rite of passage to adulthood, is crucial: foresees the impossibility of recovering the past tense, but the initiation was another type of transfer: transfer toys equivalent to recover its function for others and, therefore, for himself.
The approach can be transferred to the general relationship we have with the objects. This other story could be diverted to other surveys, however we are in a dramatic time that lasts a lifetime: to dispose of objects that have accompanied us during a particular stretch of our existence, there is a certain renunciation of personal history. Moreover, this relationship premium functional nature of the experience, as to the defect that causes the time they decided to give the tragic departure from the dump to replace them with new ones with more features, tailored to new fashions. Know the causes, but it is likely that symptoms appear with the development of industrial societies and the proliferation of manufacturing and consumption as economic activating agents. In those inflections crucial to the development of civilization, the subject was removed from it the storage capacity, as well as the importance that the objects to clarify a story: the first cassette, the console of the 80, that red jersey that use both the sides are unstitched.
Items not survive because we have accepted the consumer society as a way of life inherent psychological and intimate. If the last three decades of everyday objects, often used, were added durability and depth, a character strength that was forged with their use, today it is almost impossible to imbue the objects that surround us an identity shaped by the passing of our history. The mobile digital ubiquity paradigm and technology, and not stand in our hands if it is to update the model from time to time, as devices like the iPhone needs a constant re-enactment to cover the interest and avoid anachronisms. We stopped giving opportunity to objects. However, the paradox that sustains this mechanism is the same force that will remove the iPhone. Maybe someday return the phonograph. Is not it any other way to hear the music?
0 comments:
Post a Comment